How to Read Your Retention Power Results: From Physical Wellbeing to Self-Actualization Support

Your Retention Power Assessment gives you six scores, one for each dimension of the behaviors research links to whether people stay or leave.

Because the six dimensions follow Maslow's hierarchy,^[1] they're not equally weighted in how to interpret them — a low score on a foundational dimension warrants attention before investing in higher-level ones. But every dimension offers something specific and actionable.

→ Take the free CommStyle Assessment

How to Use the Hierarchy When Reading Results

The six dimensions are organized from foundational to highest-level. Dimensions ①②③ are the physical and psychological foundations — without these, retention power at higher levels is limited, so if you score low here, start here.

Dimension ④ is the relational layer — rapport is the context in which recognition and growth support can land effectively, and thin rapport makes both harder.

Dimensions ⑤⑥ are the motivational upper levels, with strong direct effects on engagement and commitment, though their impact is maximized when foundations are in place.

Physical Wellbeing and Psychological Safety

A higher score on Physical Wellbeing Attention (①) means you're regularly attuned to how colleagues are doing physically, noticing changes in energy and expression and acting on what you notice — a genuine relational skill research associates with stress buffering and commitment.^[3] A lower score often reflects not indifference but focus: being task-absorbed rather than person-aware, since attentiveness tends to contract under pressure.

Development direction: start at the moment of first daily contact, allowing a brief genuine check-in before moving to task-related exchanges.

A higher score on Psychological Safety (②) means you create conditions where people feel safe to speak up and make mistakes without fear of consequences — the dimension with the broadest research support for team outcomes.^[2] Lower scores often reflect specific patterns: reacting negatively to disagreement, failing to acknowledge questions, or showing frustration when mistakes are raised.

Development direction: identify your most common safety-eroding response and focus initial effort on interrupting that one pattern — the impact of one consistent safety-creating behavior tends to be larger than multiple minor adjustments.

Active Support and Rapport Formation

A higher score on Active Support (③) means you move toward people who are struggling rather than waiting for them to come to you — more valuable than reactive help because it removes the social cost of asking from someone already depleted.

Lower scores often reflect focus on your own workload, uncertainty about whether support would be welcome, and a default assumption that people will ask if they need something. Development direction: replace "I'll wait to see if they ask" with "I'll check in and make it easy to accept help."

A higher score on Rapport Formation (④) means you invest consistently in the human relationship alongside the professional one.^[4] Lower scores often reflect a genuine belief that work relationships should be primarily professional and bounded — a coherent position, but one that tends to produce a quality of relationship in which people are harder to retain.

Development direction: the most effective single behavior is remembering and returning to personal content from previous conversations.

Recognition and Self-Actualization Support

A higher score on Acknowledgment and Recognition (⑤) means you consistently notice and name what colleagues do well, providing something whose absence is one of the most common reasons people disengage and leave.^[5] Recognition gaps in otherwise caring people most commonly trace to assuming the person already knows they're doing well, or feeling explicit praise is uncomfortable or unnecessary.

Development direction: start with gratitude, which has a lower social cost than praise — "I noticed what you did with X, that made a real difference" is more powerful than general positive statements.

A higher score on Self-Actualization Support (⑥) means you actively invest in colleagues' growth and career development, listening to their aspirations and creating opportunities.

This is the highest-leverage retention behavior for employees in the middle and later phases of tenure, when foundational needs are met and the question becomes "is there a future here I want?" Lower scores often reflect that growth support requires time and attention that feel unavailable when operational demands are high.

Development direction: structured listening — a deliberate conversation about where someone wants to go — is the single most accessible entry point.

Reading the Overall Pattern

If your lowest scores are ① and ② (foundational), this is where to start — building awareness and psychological safety provides the conditions in which higher-level behaviors become more impactful.

If your lowest score is ④ (rapport), invest there — recognition and growth support land very differently in relationships with strong rapport versus thin rapport, and investing in rapport tends to amplify the impact of everything else.

If your lowest scores are ⑤ and ⑥ (recognition, growth), you have the foundations in place — these two dimensions have the most direct research link to engagement and retention decisions, so development here is likely to have the most visible impact.

If you haven't yet taken the CommStyle Retention Power Assessment, your results are the starting point for applying everything in this guide.

→ Take the free CommStyle Assessment

Frequently Asked Questions

What if my scores are uniformly high?

High scores across all six dimensions are a genuinely positive result.

The most useful next step is validating the result against others' experience — asking a trusted colleague whether your behavior matches your self-assessment, since the gap between self-perception and observed behavior is one of the most consistent findings in behavioral research.

Can I work on all six dimensions simultaneously?

You can, but focused development on one or two dimensions tends to produce faster and more durable change than spreading effort across six. Identify your lowest-scoring dimension and make it your primary focus for 4–6 weeks before expanding.

Which retention power dimension has the biggest impact?

Research on employee retention consistently identifies the quality of the direct manager relationship as the single strongest predictor of voluntary retention — stronger than compensation or career advancement opportunity in most studies.

This means the relational dimensions (rapport, genuine recognition, psychological safety) tend to have broader impact than the structural dimensions, though both matter.

How do I know if my retention power is improving?

The most direct indicators are behavioral changes in your team: are team members bringing you problems earlier? Are they sharing genuine concerns rather than only positive information? Are voluntary departures decreasing?

Formal reassessment every six to twelve months provides structured calibration.