How to Use Your Big Five Results: Practical Steps for Work, Relationships, and Growth
Knowing your Big Five profile is one thing. Using it is another.
A personality assessment becomes genuinely valuable not at the moment of taking it, but in what you do with the results afterward. The Big Five's particular strength is its substantial evidence connecting each of the five broad dimensions[5] to real-world outcomes in work, relationships, and health — giving you a clearer starting point than most tools for identifying where self-awareness is practically useful.
This guide walks you through a concrete process for applying your results — from initial reflection through specific applications in work, relationships, and personal development.
If you haven't yet taken the CommStyle Big Five, your results are where this guide becomes most useful.
Table of Contents
→ Take the free CommStyle Assessment
Step 1: Understand Your Profile First
The first and most important step is genuine understanding — not judgment, not immediate action.
Look at your full profile, not just individual scores
Start by looking at all five scores together as a pattern. Which is highest? Which is lowest? Are there dramatic contrasts — a very high score alongside a very low one? The pattern often tells a more informative story than any single score. For example:
- High C + High N — a driven, high-achieving profile that may also carry anxiety and perfectionism, producing excellent work and real personal cost if not managed well.
- High E + Low N — sociable and emotionally stable, associated with positive affect and leadership presence, though sometimes underestimating how stressful things feel for higher-N others.
- High O + Low C — creative and idea-generating, with potential execution challenges, often benefiting from external structure or collaboration.
- Low A + High C — independent and results-focused, sometimes experienced as blunt by those who prioritize relational warmth.
Sit with what surprises you
After reviewing your profile, notice where results feel immediately accurate — and where they feel off. Both are informative. Where they feel off, ask: am I answering based on how I'd like to be rather than how I actually behave? Did I have a particular context in mind that might not reflect my general tendencies?
The gap between how you see yourself and how others experience you is often where the most valuable self-knowledge lives. If results feel significantly inaccurate, consider asking a trusted colleague or partner to review them with you.
Step 2: Connect Scores to Real Situations
The Big Five becomes genuinely practical when you move from abstract scores to concrete examples from your own experience. Take 15–20 minutes and write out your answers — writing tends to produce more honest, specific responses than just thinking.
Openness: when in the last month did I seek out something genuinely new? Are there areas where I've been sticking to the familiar when exploring something new might help?
Conscientiousness: which commitments am I consistently following through on, and which am I not — what's getting in the way?
Extraversion: when do I feel most energized, and when most drained? Am I getting the kind of social or solitary time I actually need?
Agreeableness: when did I last hold back a genuine opinion to avoid conflict? When did I advocate clearly for something I believed in?
Neuroticism: what has triggered significant emotional reactivity for me recently? How long did it take to return to equilibrium?
Step 3: Apply Your Profile at Work
The research on Big Five traits and occupational outcomes is more extensive than for any other life domain. Here's how each trait tends to play out professionally.
Conscientiousness: the career-wide performer
Conscientiousness is the single strongest personality predictor of job performance across all occupational categories,[1] and one of the strongest predictors of academic performance as well.[4]
If C is high: your reliability and follow-through are assets. Watch for perfectionism that blocks "good enough" outcomes, and difficulty delegating because others won't do it "right."
If C is low: your spontaneity and adaptability are real strengths in certain environments. Watch for incomplete projects and missed commitments. External structures — accountability partnerships, deadlines with real consequences — can help compensate.
Neuroticism: managing stress and reactivity at work
High Neuroticism in professional contexts often shows up as performance anxiety, overthinking before presentations, and heightened reactivity to conflict — real challenges, particularly in high-stakes roles.
If N is high: build consistent stress-management practices into your routine — not as luxuries but as performance-critical habits. Regular exercise, adequate sleep, and recovery time are performance requirements, not optional extras. Consider working with a therapist or coach on emotional regulation skills.
If N is low: your calm under pressure is a significant asset. Be aware that your lower reactivity can make you underestimate how stressful situations are for colleagues who score higher on N.
Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Openness at work
If E is high: social roles — sales, management, client-facing work — tend to energize and suit you. Watch for restlessness in roles requiring sustained independent work. If E is low: independent, focused work suits you well; being deliberate about expressing your ideas helps others benefit from your thoughtfulness.
If A is high: you're likely easy to work with. Watch for difficulty in high-stakes negotiations and giving critical feedback. If A is low: your directness is an asset in negotiation and tough decisions — watch for leaving interpersonal damage in your wake.
If O is high: you thrive in roles rewarding innovation and strategic thinking. Watch for generating more ideas than you follow through on. If O is low: your practical, focused approach is an asset in roles requiring precision and reliable execution.
Step 4: Apply Your Profile in Relationships
Big Five traits have well-documented associations with relationship quality, communication patterns, and conflict dynamics. Understanding your own profile — and ideally your partner's — opens up more productive conversations.
Neuroticism: the relationship risk factor to take seriously
Research consistently identifies Neuroticism as the strongest personality predictor of relationship dissatisfaction, in both romantic partnerships and close friendships.[3] This doesn't mean high-N individuals can't have excellent relationships — many do. It means patterns associated with high Neuroticism (emotional reactivity, rumination, sensitivity to perceived criticism) require active management.
If your partner or close colleague is high N: predictability, reassurance, and avoiding ambiguous or harshly phrased communication reduce unnecessary activation. Understanding their reactivity as a genuine difference in emotional processing, not a character flaw, changes how you engage with difficult moments.
Agreeableness: the cooperation-assertion balance
High-A individuals are typically valued partners — warm and considerate. The challenge is that very high Agreeableness can mean genuine needs don't get expressed, leading to resentment and eventual breakdown where honesty would have helped more than habitual accommodation.
If your A is high and you hold back genuine reactions to maintain harmony, practicing direct expression in small, low-stakes situations gradually builds capacity for honest communication in higher-stakes ones. If your A is low and others find your directness harsher than intended, leading with acknowledgment before critique maintains honesty while reducing relational damage.
Extraversion and Openness differences
Introvert-extravert pairings are common and can work well, but require explicit negotiation about social schedules and recovery time. The difference isn't a values conflict — it's a difference in energy management.
Significant differences in Openness can create friction around novelty and how much a relationship looks the same from month to month. Explicitly negotiating which domains involve exploration and which involve stability can prevent the difference from becoming a recurring conflict.
Step 5: Use Your Profile for Personal Development
Identify one area to develop — not five
Identify one area where development would make the most meaningful difference right now. Trying to develop all five dimensions simultaneously is unrealistic; sustained development requires focus. Good targets: a low score creating real difficulty in an important life domain, or a very high score whose extremity is causing problems.
Develop through behavior, not willpower
The most effective way to shift behavioral patterns isn't deciding to "be more conscientious" and relying on willpower — it's building structures and habits that make the desired behavior more likely.
To develop Conscientiousness: build external accountability structures and use implementation intentions ("when X happens, I will do Y") rather than vague resolutions.
To develop emotional stability: build consistent physical recovery habits, practice catching and challenging catastrophizing thoughts, and consider evidence-based approaches like cognitive-behavioral therapy.[2]
To develop Extraversion: practice one small social engagement per week involving genuine connection. To develop Agreeableness: practice perspective-taking before responding to difficult situations. To develop Openness: schedule regular exposure to unfamiliar ideas — a book outside your usual genre, a new professional domain you've been curious about.
Track change over time
Return to the CommStyle Big Five assessment after 6–12 months of deliberate practice. Traits are relatively stable, but genuine behavioral development does show up in assessment results over time, and tracking change helps you calibrate whether your efforts are producing real shifts.
Everything in this guide rests on having your own results. If you haven't yet taken the CommStyle Big Five, the assessment is free and takes approximately 10 minutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
How quickly can I expect my scores to change?
Significant trait-level change is gradual — months to years, not days or weeks. Consistent behavioral practice produces changes visible in assessment results over periods of 6–12 months or more. Mean-level changes across adulthood unfold over years and decades.
Should I share my results with my employer?
This is a personal decision. Results can facilitate useful professional conversations about working style and development areas. Consider the culture of your organization and the specific context before sharing.
My partner and I have very different profiles. Is that a problem?
Not necessarily. Some differences are complementary — high-O with lower-O can balance novelty and stability. The dimensions where differences tend to cause friction are Neuroticism (if one partner is much higher) and, to some extent, Agreeableness. Explicit communication about how differences affect your interaction is more useful than trying to eliminate them.
Can I use the Big Five to choose a career?
It can inform career thinking without determining it. High C suits structured, achievement-oriented roles; high O suits creative and intellectually demanding ones; high E suits high-social-contact roles; lower N suits high-pressure environments. But careers are also shaped by specific skills, interests, and circumstances that scores can't capture. Use it as one input, not a directive.
Is it useful to know my partner's or colleague's profile?
It can be, if both people approach it with genuine curiosity rather than judgment. Shared language for personality differences can make conversations about friction patterns more productive.
Everything in this guide rests on having your own results. If you haven't yet taken the CommStyle Big Five, the assessment is free and takes approximately 10 minutes.
Explore More in This Series
References
- 1. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. ↩
- 2. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. [Link] ↩
- 3. Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship. [Link] ↩
- 4. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. [Link] ↩
- 5. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications. [Link] ↩