What Is an Egogram? The Psychology Behind Your

What Is an Egogram? The Psychology Behind Your Personality Profile

You've probably noticed that people communicate in very different ways. Some people are warm and caring. Others are logical and analytical. Some people show their feelings openly. Others stay calm and hold back.


These differences aren't random. A tool called the egogram can help explain them. An egogram is a simple chart. It shows how you use five different behavior patterns in daily life. It comes from Transactional Analysis (TA), a theory of personality created by psychiatrist Eric Berne in the 1950s.


The egogram doesn't put you in a box or give you a "type." Instead, it shows how your different tendencies balance against each other — and where you might want to grow. This article explains what an egogram is, where it comes from, what research says about it, and how you can use it in everyday life.

→ Take the free CommStyle Assessment

What Is an Egogram?

An egogram is a bar chart. It shows how strong each of five behavior patterns is in your personality. Psychiatrist John M. Dusay created the idea. He introduced it in a 1972 paper in the Transactional Analysis Journal.[1]


Dusay called it a "personality profile." It shows how much energy you put into five different ways of behaving: Critical Parent (CP), Nurturing Parent (NP), Adult (A), Free Child (FC), and Adapted Child (AC). We'll explain each one below.


The egogram doesn't sort you into a fixed type. Instead, it shows a balance — a snapshot of how these five tendencies work together right now. That balance can shift over time.

The Constancy Hypothesis

Dusay had a theory called the Constancy Hypothesis. He believed the total amount of psychological energy in a person stays about the same. This means if one behavior pattern grows stronger, another one usually gets weaker. For example, if you become more critical, you may become less playful.


This idea is useful in therapy and coaching. But it hasn't been proven by brain science. Think of it as a helpful way of looking at behavior — not a scientific law.

Where the Idea Came From

The egogram comes from Transactional Analysis (TA). Eric Berne, a psychiatrist, created TA in the late 1950s. He wanted a theory of personality that was easy to understand — not just for therapists, but for anyone.


Berne published his first paper on TA in 1957.[3] By 1964, his book Games People Play had become an unexpected bestseller. It brought TA ideas to a wide audience.


Berne said people act from three basic "ego states": Parent, Adult, and Child. Later, other TA thinkers split these into five: Critical Parent, Nurturing Parent, Adult, Free Child, and Adapted Child. This five-part model became the basis for the egogram.


At first, people drew their own egogram bars by feel — no scoring system, just intuition. Later, researchers wanted something more reliable. In 1979, researcher N. Robert Heyer created one of the first standardized egogram questionnaires.[4] This paved the way for better tools.


The most well-researched tool today is the Tokyo University Egogram (TEG), first published in 1984 by researchers at the University of Tokyo.


It has been updated twice. The current version, TEG ver.3, defines 33 different pattern types. TEG is widely used in Japan for medical, school, and workplace research.[6]

The Five Ego States Explained

Each of the five ego states shows up as its own cluster of behaviors and language patterns. Here's what each one looks like in daily life.

CP — Critical Parent

Critical Parent (CP) is the part of you that sets rules and standards. When you're in CP mode, you judge, correct, and point out what's wrong. A healthy amount of CP helps you lead, keep standards high, and act with integrity. Too much CP can look harsh, rigid, or controlling.


Key behaviors: correcting others, enforcing rules, expressing disapproval, offering unsolicited advice, setting firm boundaries.

NP — Nurturing Parent

Nurturing Parent (NP) is the caring, supportive side of you. In NP mode, you comfort people, encourage them, and look out for others. High NP usually means you're warm and easy to relate to. Too much NP can turn into over-protecting people or doing too much for them.


Key behaviors: offering comfort, praising others, showing patience, helping without being asked, expressing genuine concern.

A — Adult

Adult (A) is your calm, logical, present-focused side. In A mode, you gather facts, think clearly, and make decisions based on what's actually happening — not old habits or strong emotions.


A strong Adult function helps with problem-solving and clear communication. If it's too weak, you may react without thinking things through. Key behaviors: asking clarifying questions, analyzing situations calmly, acknowledging multiple perspectives, making evidence-based decisions.

FC — Free Child

Free Child (FC) is your playful, spontaneous, creative side. In FC mode, you laugh easily, take fun risks, and show your feelings openly. High FC brings creativity and joy. Many adults suppress this part — especially at work — which can leave them feeling flat or disconnected from what they enjoy.


Key behaviors: expressing enthusiasm, engaging in play, showing genuine emotion, being creative, acting on impulse in positive ways.

AC — Adapted Child

Adapted Child (AC) is the part of you shaped by childhood rules and expectations. In AC mode, you go along with things, avoid conflict, or seek approval. Some AC is healthy — it helps you cooperate and get along with others. Too much AC can mean you struggle to speak up for yourself.


Research using TEG has found that high AC scores are often linked to anxious feelings and low mood.[5] A high AC score isn't a flaw — but it's worth paying attention to.


Key behaviors: seeking approval, avoiding conflict, being overly apologetic, following rules without question, or conversely, passive resistance.

How an Egogram Is Measured

There are a few ways to build an egogram profile.

The Original Method: Drawing by Feel

In Dusay's original method, you and a coach or therapist draw bars for each ego state based on feeling, not numbers. Dusay believed the process itself was valuable — it makes you reflect on your own behavior.


This method is useful, but it's subjective. Research shows self-ratings can be skewed by stress or a weak Adult function.[4][10]

Standardized Questionnaires

  • TEG (Tokyo University Egogram) — the most researched tool. Each of its five scales meets standard reliability benchmarks (Cronbach's alpha above 0.7).
  • Heyer Ego State Profile Questionnaire — an early standardized tool from the late 1970s.
  • Egogram Check List — a shorter self-report tool used in Japan.

The CommStyle Egogram

CommStyle offers a free online egogram test. It uses a structured questionnaire — not guesswork — to estimate your current balance across the five ego states.

→ Take the free CommStyle Assessment

What the Research Shows

The egogram has been studied for over fifty years. Here's a fair summary of what the evidence shows — and where it's weaker.

What Supports It

Studies using TEG find real differences between clinical patients and healthy people. Patients tend to score higher on AC and CP, and lower on FC.[5] TEG scores also line up with other measures, like anxious feelings and low mood.


A 2022 review of Transactional Analysis therapy — the first of its kind — found that TA treatment led to real improvements in wellbeing. Changes in ego states were one of the strongest predictors of that improvement.[9]


Interest in TA research has grown again in recent years. A 2021 review mapped out what the evidence actually supports.[8] Other studies have tracked how egogram patterns shift across generations in Japan. More recent groups tend to show higher AC and lower A scores than earlier ones.[7]

Where It's Weaker

The original, hand-drawn egogram is subjective. People may rate themselves the way they want to be seen, not how they actually behave. Research on egograms slowed down after the early 1980s. Much of the existing research involves small studies, not large trials.


TEG was built and tested mainly on Japanese populations. It's not fully clear how well its norms apply elsewhere.

Common Patterns

TEG ver.3 defines 33 pattern types. A few show up often in research and practice:

  • "M" pattern (high NP and FC, low CP and AC) — warm, spontaneous, and creative, but may struggle to set firm boundaries.
  • "W" pattern (high CP, low NP and A, high AC) — strict but also eager to please others.
  • "N" pattern (high CP and A, low NP, FC, and AC) — rational and principled, but can seem distant.
  • Flat profile (all five states are close in size) — flexible, but may lack a clear "signature" style.

How It Compares to Other Personality Tests

Egogram vs. MBTI

MBTI sorts people into 16 fixed types. The egogram doesn't use types — it shows a continuous profile across five behavior patterns. MBTI describes stable preferences. The egogram is built around change — it's meant to show where you might grow.


For a detailed comparison, see: Egogram vs MBTI: Key Differences and Which One to Use

Egogram vs. Big Five

The Big Five (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism) is the most researched personality model in academic psychology.


The egogram measures something different: dynamic behavior patterns, not fixed traits. The two tools aren't really in competition — they measure different things.

How to Use Your Results

The egogram is used in therapy, coaching, schools, and workplaces. But its biggest value may be personal: it gives you a simple language for your own behavior patterns. Once you have your profile, the best question isn't "is my score high or low?" It's "does this balance serve the life I want?"


A high CP score isn't automatically bad — leaders often need it. But if it crowds out NP (warmth) or FC (spontaneity), it may hurt your relationships.


A high AC score isn't a flaw either — being considerate is valuable. But if it's crowding out FC or A, you may be holding back your own needs too often.

A Few Things Worth Knowing

A high score in any state isn't automatically "good" or "bad." What matters is whether your current balance works for your life. Your profile isn't fixed. It reflects your current patterns — not permanent traits. It can change with awareness and practice.


The egogram doesn't measure intelligence or character. Two people with the same profile can live very different lives. For more on this topic, see: 5 Common Misunderstandings About Egograms For a full guide to interpreting your results, see: How to Read Your Egogram Results

What the Egogram Can't Tell You

Being honest about limits matters. Here's what an egogram does not do. It's not a diagnosis. It cannot identify depression, anxiety, or any mental health condition. If you're struggling, please talk to a professional instead.


It's not a measure of intelligence or worth. People across every kind of profile lead full, successful lives. It doesn't predict your behavior with certainty. It shows a general tendency — not a fixed destiny. A person with a low FC score can still be playful when it counts.


And it's not a finished science. Transactional Analysis is still an active area of research. Use the egogram as a helpful lens — not the final word.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an egogram in simple terms?

It's a bar chart that shows how much of your behavior comes from five modes: strict (CP), caring (NP), logical (A), playful (FC), and compliant (AC). It comes from Transactional Analysis, a theory Eric Berne developed in the 1950s.

Who developed the egogram?

John M. Dusay, a psychiatrist who trained under Eric Berne. He introduced it in a 1972 paper[1] and expanded on it in his 1977 book, Egograms: How I See You and You See Me.[2]

Is the egogram scientifically valid?

It's a mixed picture. The standardized version (TEG) has solid reliability and meaningful links to real-world outcomes. The original hand-drawn version is more subjective. Think of it as a useful reflective tool, not a lab-grade instrument.

How is an egogram different from MBTI?

MBTI assigns you a fixed type. The egogram shows a changeable profile across five behavior patterns instead.

Can my results change over time?

Yes. Your profile reflects current patterns, not permanent traits. Life changes, practice, and awareness can all shift it.

How long does the assessment take?

About 10 minutes. The CommStyle Egogram is free.

What's a "normal" pattern?

There isn't one single normal pattern. TEG ver.3 defines 33 types. What matters is whether your current balance works for your life — not matching a specific pattern.

Understanding the theory is only the first step. The real value of an egogram comes from seeing your own profile — and using it as a starting point for reflection.


CommStyle offers a free egogram assessment based on structured self-report questions. Your results will show your current balance across all five ego states, with an explanation of what each score means and how the pattern fits together.

References

  1. 1. Dusay, J. M. (1972). Egograms and the Constancy Hypothesis. [Link] ↩
  2. 2. Dusay, J. M. (1977). Egograms: How I See You and You See Me. ↩
  3. 3. Berne, E. (1957). Ego states in psychotherapy. ↩
  4. 4. Heyer, N. R. (1979). Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Ego States with Some Applications to Social and Comparative Psychiatry. [Link] ↩
  5. 5. Yoshiuchi, K., Horie, H., Oshima, K., Shimura, M., Nomura, S., Wada, M., Tawara, R., Nakao, M., Kuboki, T., & Suematsu, H. (1995–1996). The Clinical Application Studies of Tokyo University Egogram, Second Edition (TEG 2.0). ↩
  6. 6. Bando, H. (2018). Psychological Study of Egogram can be Helpful Medically and Socially for Better Life. [Link] ↩
  7. 7. Yokoyama, T., & Bando, H. (2021). Psychological Application for New Version of Tokyo University Egogram Battery. [Link] ↩
  8. 8. Vos, J., & van Rijn, B. (2021). The Evidence-Based Conceptual Model of Transactional Analysis: A Focused Review of the Research Literature. [Link] ↩
  9. 9. Vos, J., & van Rijn, B. (2022). The Effectiveness of Transactional Analysis Treatments and Their Predictors: A Systematic Literature Review and Explorative Meta-Analysis. [Link] ↩
  10. 10. Kinmond, K. S., & Watkin, M. A. Transactional Analysis: A Review. ↩