Non-Cognitive Skills Assessment

Grit, Persistence, and Adaptability: What Research Shows About Sustaining Effort and Navigating Change

Two of the most important non-cognitive skills for long-term effectiveness and wellbeing are also among the most discussed and the most frequently misunderstood: grit, the combination of passion and perseverance for long-term goals, and adaptability, the capacity to adjust effectively when circumstances change.


Research demonstrated that grit predicted achievement in military academy cadets, spelling bee finalists, and Ivy League undergraduates, independently of cognitive ability.[1] This article examines what the research actually shows about both capacities, their limits, and how they can be developed.

→ Take the free CommStyle Assessment

What Grit Is

The grit framework describes it as the combination of passion, sustained interest in long-term goals over years, not just weeks, and perseverance, sustained effort despite obstacles and setbacks.


The key insight is that these two components are conceptually and empirically distinct: someone can be highly passionate but lack perseverance, intense but inconsistent, or highly perseverant but lack passion, persistent but without the motivational depth that sustains effort over years.

What the Research Actually Shows About Grit

Grit has been one of the most discussed psychological constructs of the past decade, and one of the most carefully scrutinized. The initial findings were striking: grit predicted achievement in diverse high-demand contexts independently of IQ. The subsequent research has been more nuanced.


A meta-analysis of grit research found that grit does predict outcomes, but the effect size is substantially smaller than early enthusiasm suggested, that grit's predictive power is largely shared with the conscientiousness dimension of the Big Five personality model, and that the two components of grit may be less equally important than initially proposed, with perseverance showing stronger predictive power in most studies.[2] The practical implication: persistence, sustained effort toward goals despite obstacles, is a genuine predictor of achievement and is developable, though the construct of grit as something distinct from conscientiousness remains debated.

What Enables Persistence

Values alignment matters: goals connected to genuine values, things that matter intrinsically rather than just instrumentally, are pursued more persistently than goals adopted for external reasons, since autonomous motivation, pursuing goals because you genuinely want to, sustains effort more effectively than controlled motivation.[4] Meaning-making matters too, since the capacity to find meaning, learning, or progress even in the frustrating middle phases of long-term pursuit, when initial motivation has faded, is a consistent predictor of sustained effort.


And recovery practices matter, since research on long-term sustained effort finds that recovery, both within-day and across-day, is as important as effort, since sustained high-effort without adequate recovery produces diminishing returns and eventually burnout rather than achievement.

What Adaptability Is and Why It Matters More Than It Used To

Adaptability, the capacity to adjust effectively when circumstances change, was formally characterized as an important workplace competency by identifying eight facets: handling emergencies, handling work stress, solving problems creatively, dealing with uncertain situations, learning new tasks, interpersonal adaptability, cultural adaptability, and physically oriented adaptability.[3]


The research case for adaptability as a critical competency has strengthened as the pace of change in work environments has accelerated. Roles that were stable for years now change substantially over months.


In this context, adaptability isn't an optional supplement to core competencies, it's itself a core competency, and research on adaptability and job performance consistently finds that it predicts performance in dynamic environments more strongly than general cognitive ability, which is better suited to stable, well-defined problems.

The Cognitive and Emotional Components of Adaptability

Adaptability involves both cognitive components, the ability to update mental models rapidly and generate novel approaches to novel problems, and emotional components, the tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity, the emotional regulation that allows effective functioning when the familiar is unavailable.


Research on adaptability in change management contexts finds that emotional components, particularly the ability to manage anxiety about uncertainty, are often more limiting than cognitive components for adults with adequate cognitive ability.


Development of adaptability therefore requires attention to both the cognitive skills of flexible thinking and the emotional regulation capacities that allow those skills to be deployed under stress.

Developing Persistence

Connect goals to values: before pursuing any significant goal, articulate explicitly why it matters to you in terms of your genuine values, not what you think you should value, but what you actually do, since this connection provides motivational depth that sustains effort when external rewards are absent or distant.


Build completion habits: the habit of completing things, following through on commitments to yourself and others, is itself developable and transfers across domains.


Normalize the difficult middle: many long-term pursuits are abandoned not at the beginning, when motivation is high, or at the end, when completion is visible, but in the middle, when motivation has faded and the goal is still distant.


Explicitly anticipating this phase and preparing if-then strategies for it significantly improves completion rates.

Developing Adaptability

Deliberate novelty-seeking develops adaptability most reliably, since practice with change and novelty at manageable levels of challenge, routine seeking of small new experiences, new routes, new social contexts, new learning domains, builds the adaptive capacity and tolerance for novelty that transfers to larger changes.


Update practices help too: when circumstances change, explicitly acknowledge what the previous approach was, why it made sense in context, and what the new situation requires, a metacognitive practice that builds the cognitive flexibility adaptability requires.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is grit just conscientiousness by another name?

Research suggests substantial overlap, since the correlation between grit and conscientiousness is approximately 0.77 in most studies.


The practical implication: developing conscientiousness-related behaviors, reliability, follow-through, organization, self-discipline, is likely to develop much of what's captured by the grit construct.


The two-component model, passion plus perseverance, remains useful as a way of thinking about what sustained long-term pursuit requires.

Some people seem naturally more persistent and adaptable. Is development really possible?

Yes. Both constructs show meaningful individual differences that are partly genetic and partly developmental, but both also show substantial development in response to deliberate practice.


Research on mindset is directly relevant here: people who believe that persistence and adaptability can be developed tend to develop them more than those who believe these capacities are fixed.[5]

Is grit more important than talent?

Research doesn't support a simple either/or answer.


Grit research established that grit predicts achievement independently of measured talent, but subsequent meta-analyses found that the effect size of grit is substantially shared with conscientiousness, and that talent remains a significant independent predictor.


The most accurate characterization: talent determines the ceiling of potential achievement, while grit and persistence determine how much of that potential is actually realized.

References

  1. 1. Duckworth, A. L., et al. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and Passion for Long-Term Goals. [Link] ↩
  2. 2. Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Much Ado About Grit. [Link] ↩
  3. 3. Pulakos, E. D., et al. (2000). Adaptability in the Workplace. [Link] ↩
  4. 4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-Determination Theory. [Link] ↩
  5. 5. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House. ↩